How many regions in this table?

Can you describe in more detail what exactly the test does?

Random read, then join (with another hbase table?), then random write back to 
HBase?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: y_823...@tsmc.com [mailto:y_823...@tsmc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 10:57 PM
> To: hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org
> Cc: jlhu...@cs.nctu.edu.tw
> Subject: Re: The occasion to add region server
> 
> Region Server Count     Taken Time(sec)
> 20                       1267
> 15                       1257
> 10                       1264
> 9                        1251
> 8                        1541
> 7                        1453
> 6                        1720
> 5                      no result         2 region server crash
> 
> 
> My job is radom read data from Hbase then save it back to hhbase after
> some
> join.
> There's not much difference between 9~20 regionservers.
> Apparently it can get performance enhance by scaling out regionserver
> from
> 5,6  to 9 or above regionservers .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Fleming Chiu(邱宏明)
> 707-6128
> y_823...@tsmc.com
> 週一無肉日吃素救地球(Meat Free Monday Taiwan)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                       y_823...@tsmc.com
>                                                To:      hbase-
> u...@hadoop.apache.org
>                       2010/03/24 09:50         cc:      (bcc:
> Y_823910/TSMC)
>                       AM                       Subject: Re: The
> occasion to add region server
>                       Please respond to
>                       hbase-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I ran my job while regionservers stop loading regions.
> All regionservers almost got the equal amount of regions.
> OK, I'll try to shrink my region server to 5 and 3.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Fleming Chiu(邱宏明)
> 707-6128
> y_823...@tsmc.com
> 週一無肉日吃素救地球(Meat Free Monday Taiwan)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                       Stack
> 
>                       <saint....@gmail.        To:
> "hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org" <hbase-user@hadoop.apache.org>
> 
>                       com>                     cc:      (bcc:
> Y_823910/TSMC)
> 
>                                                Subject: Re: The
> occasion to
> add region server
>                       2010/03/24 09:40
> 
>                       AM
> 
>                       Please respond to
> 
>                       hbase-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> You saw no difference. Before starting job all regionservers had equal
> amount of regions.  Were regionservers loaded while the job ran.   Try
> with 5 regionservers.  If same for sure something is of.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mar 23, 2010, at 6:02 PM, y_823...@tsmc.com wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > Our cluster with 20 machines(4 core, 12G Ram, 1U server)
> > HBase Version 0.20.2, r834515
> > --------------------------------------------
> > ZK               :    3
> > DataNode         :   20
> > Total Region     : 2088
> > Region Server    :   10  <<--
> > Client Connection:   20
> > My job took time : 1264 sec
> > --------------------------------------------
> > ZK               :    3
> > DataNode         :   20
> > Total Region     : 2088
> > Region Server    :   15  <<--
> > Client Connection:   20
> > My job took time : 1257 sec
> > --------------------------------------------
> > ZK               :    3
> > DataNode         :   20
> > Total Region     : 2088
> > Region Server    :   20  <<--
> > Client Connection:   20
> > My job took time : 1267 sec
> >
> > According to the above result, it didn't get the performance enhance
> > after
> > adding region servers.
> > why?
> > I wonder when is the best occasion to add extra region server.
> > In my machine's spec ,maybe a region server will always get a good
> > performance with regions under 300.
> > Any ideas, thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Fleming Chiu(邱宏明)
> > 707-6128
> > y_823...@tsmc.com
> > 週一無肉日吃素救地球(Meat Free Monday Taiwan)
> >
> >
> > ---
> > ---
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                                                         TSMC PROPERTY
> > This email communication (and any attachments) is proprietary
> > information
> > for the sole use of its
> > intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by
> > anyone
> > other than the intended
> > recipient is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended
> > recipient,
> > please notify the sender by
> > replying to this email, and then delete this email and any copies of
> > it
> > immediately. Thank you.
> > ---
> > ---
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> 
>                                                          TSMC PROPERTY
> 
>  This email communication (and any attachments) is proprietary
> information
> 
>  for the sole use of its
> 
>  intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by
> anyone
> 
>  other than the intended
> 
>  recipient is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended
> recipient,
> 
>  please notify the sender by
> 
>  replying to this email, and then delete this email and any copies of
> it
> 
>  immediately. Thank you.
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
>                                                          TSMC PROPERTY
>  This email communication (and any attachments) is proprietary
> information
>  for the sole use of its
>  intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by
> anyone
>  other than the intended
>  recipient is strictly prohibited.  If you are not the intended
> recipient,
>  please notify the sender by
>  replying to this email, and then delete this email and any copies of
> it
>  immediately. Thank you.
>  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----
> 
> 

Reply via email to