Davor Ocelic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And I think we should wait with the expansion or colocation plans > until our member base justifies it. (We should not wait for *too > long* and then refuse new applications for months before we expand, > but I think we shouldn't be getting to expansion just yet either).
I disagree. Our current provider is unsatisfactory in several ways. That alone would justify a move ASAP. In order to encourage and facilitate growth in the membership, we should be moving forward in the provider search *now*. Last year, one of my friends was considering HCoop, but because of the long membership freeze, went with an inferior provider instead. Let's prevent the same situation from happening again, or at least decrease the likelihood. The price categories on the poll look about right to me; can we start the poll? -- Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/ Interests: Emacs Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net /` |\ | | | IRC: mwolson on freenode.net: #hcoop, #muse, #PurdueLUG |_] | \| |_| Project involvement: Emacs, Muse, Planner, ERC, EMMS
pgpPeCKzAvKr5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Hcoop-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
