Nathan Kennedy wrote: > Adam Chlipala wrote: > >> Nathan Kennedy wrote: >> >> >> >>> 3. Details of our relationship with Xiolink and Interserver, as well as >>> any conflicts of interest. I am asserting that no conflicts exist as >>> well as explaining our selection process. However I *must* have from >>> Adam copies of our hosting agreement with Xiolink and Interserver, and >>> also if possible copies of our most recent monthly statements from each >>> of these. >>> >>> >>> >> I've put up some preliminary information at >> http://www.schizomaniac.net/irs/ >> excluding scanned copies of things with physical signatures. >> >> I will scan the agreements and get them to you soon. The Xiolink >> agreement has a space for a Xiolink representative's signature, but I >> don't think they ever mailed me back a version with that signature >> filled in. Do you think we should just submit the version without it >> and wait for possible complaints (probably including a note explaining >> the reason)? >> >> > I really don't think that's an issue. If we can get scans of a physical > signed copy that's best, just in terms of the best thing we have to > offer. But a contract doesn't have to be signed by both parties to be > enforceable. It doesn't even have be signed excepted where the statute > of frauds applies (which it does not in this case since our leases are > month-to-month) and even then it only needs to be signed by the party to > be charged. Assuming the documents you were going to scan are merely signed versions of the ones already up on the website, I don't actually think you need to bother getting them scanned.
-ntk _______________________________________________ Hcoop-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
