Nathan Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Previously I had advocated on the wiki and the list having a two-tiered > (or possibly, three-tiered) pricing scheme when we move to our new > hosting setup. This is because a few of our members don't want or can't > afford to pay the higher rate and at the same time have extremely low > usage levels such that they cannot justify these costs. A handful of > our members consume most of the bandwidth and disk space usage, a large > group falls in the middle with moderate usage, and a small group uses > practically no resources.
As one of the members who consume most of the bandwidth and disk space, I think it would be better to go back to the way we handled bandwidth on Abulafia (when we had to pay by the gig): if you use more than the average use level you pay a larger share. I think it would be simplest to base it on disk usage (as it is the resource with the largest real cost); if you need 2x the normal quota you pay 2x the normal member price. -- http://unknownlamer.org Jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM:unknownlamer IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm just thinking aloud; isn't thinking allowed? 443E 4F1A E213 7C54 A306 E328 7601 A1F0 F403 574B _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
