Nathan Kennedy wrote: >1. I think any scheme dependent on members voluntarily paying more or >less based on willingness, and not usage or some other factor, is a >terrible idea. [snip] > >2. I would like to reiterate that I think it would be a big mistake to >enforce equal dues and equal services for every member, and I think >Terrence is spot-on here. > But consider what the causal relationship is between member resource usage and how much we pay for colocation: until we reach a saturation point where Peer 1's offer is no longer good enough for us, there is no relationship at all! So why base monthly dues towards colocation costs on resource usage? I can see it more for one-time costs of buying new hardware as we outgrow old hardware, but that should happen infrequently enough that the issues are much less important.
_______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
