On 11/9/06, Nathan Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shaun Kruger wrote: > > Right now hcoop is just self insuring the servers. I would have to > > agree that looking for a provider that doesn't require hcoop to insure > > against damage to the facility would be a good idea. > > > > Does peer1 not insure their facility against loss? Does peer1 have a > > rider in their facility insurance policy that excludes damages by > > customer equipment? > > > In case you missed this from the previous email, they don't enforce this > term and none of their customers are actually buying this insurance.
No, I saw it. I consider unenforced terms to be hazardous. If something goes wrong peer1 has a built in excuse and hcoop has a liability. Having a problem is not likely, but if it wasn't such a big deal they would remove the clause. Shaun -- Visit my blog at http://hackerlog.blogspot.com ===================================================== If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. -- J.R.R. Tolkien _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
