[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I am saying at a minimum baseline, social responsibility demands that >>> the >>> power we are directly purchasing for our operations be as clean as is >>> _*practical*_. >>> >> It only demands what the coop decides it does. I'm fine with the >> current proposal, although I would prefer that we buy clean energy and >> *actually use it*. Don't some states actually let you choose what >> source you buy power from? >> > > Dude, are you reading my emails? We have no control whatsoever over what > source we buy power from, because that is up to Peer1. Power is part of > our bundle of services in our colocation agreement. > This is my last post on the matter. We're paying for carbon credits for a product we're not even purchasing ourselves, and I think it's ridiculous. Reasonable people can disagree about the scope of "environmental responsibility," and the extent to which the coop supports this. I firmly oppose encoding support of carbon trading as coop policy.
Thanks, Dave. _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
