On Apr 7, 2007, at 12:54 AM, Adam Chlipala wrote:
I feel personally hurt by notions like those that "environmental
policy"
is more important in this election than records of handling the _real_
issues that show up in keeping the co-op from collapsing.
[...]
I've done at least 90% of all work ever done to support HCoop, and I
like to think that puts me in a position to have a pretty good idea of
where we stand and what the important challenges over the next year
are. I feel like I'm being punished for accurately reporting that we
have some major fundamental infrastructural issues to address
before it
makes sense to look beyond running a quality Internet hosting service,
while other candidates who haven't had any hand in the day-to-day
operations of HCoop are rewarded for proposing ideas based on
unrealistic models of where the co-op stands today.
[...]
after 5 years of
running this service, I truly feel that working on anything else takes
critical effort away from some _serious_ issues that we have to
work on
in terms of hosting reliability and sustainability of how we
distribute
work among volunteers.
I completely agree with this position and fully support Adam's
position and outlook in this respect. I think it's important to
prioritize those things which are designed to improve the service and
sustainability of this Coop; by a large margin, these are the issues
that should consume most of the board's time, imo.
--
Aaron Hsu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
HCoop-Discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
