On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 02:09:49PM -0400, Chris Beggy wrote: > Thanks for all of the work on AFS and the associated workarounds. > It seems to me, from the traffic on this list and the sysadmin > list, that implementation of afs has pushed out the switchover to > the new server at the expensive provider. That has had a cost. > > Going forward, I suspect the afs server implementation will > require dedicated/paid sysadmins for maintenance and may require > moving to Transarc commercial afs server software. Most of the > AFS installations I know use Transarc/IBM server and openafs > clients.
We've got quite a reputable member group; I doubt HCoop will have to outsource non-member admins for anything. And as far as I am into the AFS scene, IBM/Transarc code has its share of problems and people don't use it for new installations. Cya, -doc _______________________________________________ HCoop-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-discuss
