I think megacz has a standard answer to this. I don't remember if we have a wiki page to refer people to when they ask this (frequent) question. Do we? Ideally, someone would have answered Daniel's question simply by giving that URL.
Nathan Kennedy wrote: > authorized_keys support was abandoned when we switched to AFS because our > admins simply could not figure out how to make this feature of sshd > compatible with our AFS setup and permissions. There is nothing wrong with > sshd, and this is a limitation we would rather not have, but which we have > been living with. It's also not something wrong with our admins, as it > seems that greater installations than HCoop have not solved this problem. > > You are correct that kerberos is the supported alternative to ssh keys. > > -ntk > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:32:24 -0800, "Daniel Wilkerson" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'll bet someone has asked this before but my meta-point is that >> finding out stuff on the hoop site is sometimes a bit challenging. >> Anyway, why are we using Kerberos instead of .ssh/authorized_keys to >> allow automatic login? Is there something wrong with ssh? >> _______________________________________________ HCoop-Help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.hcoop.net/listinfo/hcoop-help
