On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 10:21:40 -0700 Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the crux of my point is that at HCOOP we don't use kerberos > directly for any service that works this way, and we're unlikely to do > so in the future since all non-AFS [*] authentication is done via PAM. Yes, but this is only because PAM is more convenient.. I couldn't say that there will be no other service that will use Kerberos directly.. We actually don't care, as long as there is at least one way to make it honor kerberos.. _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
