Adam Megacz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Michael Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This sounds reasonable to me.  If this change is OK with docelic, then I
>> will install the denyhosts package on deleuze so that ssh script kiddies
>> are kept out -- I use it on all of the machines that I maintain.  I'm
>> assuming that was the reason that we went with the nonstandard port
>> (namely: ssh kiddies).
>
> Do we need this?  Hcoop already forces users to choose extremely
> strong passwords; dictionary attacks are not a concern.

Yes, we do.  Even if only for the fact that it keeps the logs clean.
I will double the default "tolerance" of denyhosts so that it is
nearly impossible for a user to lock themself out.

-- 
Michael Olson -- FSF Associate Member #652 -- http://www.mwolson.org/
Interests: Lisp, text markup, protocols -- Jabber: mwolson_at_hcoop.net
  /` |\ | | | Projects: Emacs, Muse, ERC, EMMS, Planner, ErBot, DVC
 |_] | \| |_| Reclaim your digital rights by eliminating DRM.
      See http://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm for details.

Attachment: pgpWVqZG9nmRN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list
[email protected]
http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin

Reply via email to