Hello, > > Adam Chlipala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think that's very inaccurate. We are using individual migrations as >> _convenient_, _realistic_ _examples_ in the _initial_testing_ of >> fundamental system services. The fact that particular users end up with >> accounts on the new servers is a secondary benefit. > > In that case, I should have written that "example-collecting is > currently the only limiting factor to progress right now". > > In order to move forward more rapidly, we need to take > "example-collecting" off the critical path as soon as possible. >
I agree. Taking one user at a time with very specific needs is not a good use of time. I'm very certain that admins can take care of any issues related to specific available subsystems mentioned previously. Adam C., I think it is appropriate to defer to the admins at this point as to whether or not people can begin using certain subsystems of hcoop's new servers. After all, it has been a point of yours all along to deal mostly with just domtool. That said, I've complete faith that our admins can handle the challenge and accelerate the migration process; they're really terrific at what they do (thanks Michael, Adam M., Davor, Justin (did I forget any other admins?), you've all been astonishingly amazing). Although the timing may be suspect, ramping up "example-collecting" would be tangible progress that may take away some sourness from a few users. But it'd be wrong to do this without giving fair warning to users. For example, things may change due to newly discovered problems, causing possible incompatibilities with their personal setup. Who knows, perhaps there are users with show-stoppers that we won't get to until it's much too late if we go one at a time. > - a > best, Ryan _______________________________________________ HCoop-SysAdmin mailing list [email protected] http://hcoop.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/hcoop-sysadmin
