Hi Chao, See this earlier list thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/hcp-users@humanconnectome.org/msg05148.html
As is stated in that thread, we don't recommend using the the IntraCranial volume estimate. Best, Jenn Jennifer Elam, Ph.D. Scientific Outreach, Human Connectome Project Washington University School of Medicine Department of Neuroscience, Box 8108 660 South Euclid Avenue St. Louis, MO 63110 314-362-9387<tel:314-362-9387> e...@wustl.edu<mailto:e...@wustl.edu> www.humanconnectome.org<http://www.humanconnectome.org/> ________________________________ From: hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Chao Zhang <cha...@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 2:25:32 PM To: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org Subject: [HCP-Users] FreeSurfer brain volume question Hi We were checking the FS brain volumes and found that out of the 1113 subjects for 14 subjects the FS_BrainSeg_Vol is larger than the FS_IntraCranial_Vol (so that the column FS_BrainSegVol_eTIV_Ratio is larger than 1). We wonder if this is due to some error in calculating either of the two columns (FS_BrainSeg_Vol, FS_IntraCranial_Vol)? Thanks! Best, Chao _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
