Dear HCP members/Users,

Thanks so much for your prompt advice and suggestions!

Steve, if I were to perform ICA on the grayordinates would I still be able to 
dualregress this onto a patient nifti dataset? Like others have suggested, 
wouldn't my patient data need to be in cifti?

Cheers :)

Will


________________________________
From: Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
Sent: 14 March 2018 01:14:51
To: Harms, Michael; Stephen Smith; Will Khan
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org; Erin W. E. Dickie
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Melodic ICA idle

I would recommend the ciftify toolbox if your patient data do not meet HCP 
Pipelines acquisition requirements (lacking highres T2w scan and or Fieldmap).  
The ciftify toolbox is currently beta, but should be fully available in the 
very near future (Erin Dickie the author is CCed and can give more details).  
It is intended to assist users with legacy data in processing using HCP-Style 
analyses including dual regression in CIFTI.  If you need volume maps for your 
patients too, as Steve says you can do the first stage of dual regression in 
CIFTI to get the timecourses and then regress these into both the CIFTI and 
volume data.  We do this all the time if we need to see what is going on 
outside the greymatter (e.g. we are denoising data).

I will note that even fMRI data with coarse voxel resolution (e.g. 4mm 
isotropic) will still benefit from HCP-Style analyses over traditional analyses 
(see in the attached figure that the 4mm dots are essentially all above the 
line of equality between volume and surface).  The attached figure does not 
consider the effects of volume-based smoothing which are even more serious than 
volume-based alignment 
(https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/01/29/255620<https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/01/29/255620>).

Of course in the future we recommend acquiring HCP Style data (fMRI 2.4mm 
isotropic or better, 1s TR or better; T1w and T2w 0.8mm isotropic or better, 
and phase reversed field maps) and processing with the HCP Pipelines or an 
equivalent or better approach.

Peace,

Matt.

From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of "Harms, Michael" <mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>>
Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 7:48 AM
To: Stephen Smith <st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk<mailto:st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk>>, Will 
Khan <khan.wa...@florey.edu.au<mailto:khan.wa...@florey.edu.au>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Melodic ICA idle




I think the issue, as I read it, is that Will’s data is only NIFTI currently, 
so he doesn’t have any subject CIFTI that he could use for the stage 1 of dual 
reg.



Our suggestion of course to remedy that would be that you process your data 
into CIFTI, using the HCP Pipelines. ☺



Cheers,

-MH



--

Michael Harms, Ph.D.

-----------------------------------------------------------

Associate Professor of Psychiatry

Washington University School of Medicine

Department of Psychiatry, Box 8134

660 South Euclid Ave.                        Tel: 314-747-6173

St. Louis, MO  63110                          Email: 
mha...@wustl.edu<mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>



From: 
<hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org>>
 on behalf of Stephen Smith <st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk<mailto:st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk>>
Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 2:31 AM
To: Will Khan <khan.wa...@florey.edu.au<mailto:khan.wa...@florey.edu.au>>
Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" 
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Melodic ICA idle



Hi Will



I'm not aware of any outstanding bugs in melodic that would cause it to 
silently hang.  Are you sure it's not just that you've run out of RAM and are 
swapping?



Yes it's better to do group-ICA on grayordinates. You can still dual-regress 
that (step one into subject CIFTI, step two back into either CIFIT and/or 
volume) to get volume maps back, like we did for the most recent group-ICA HCP 
release.



Cheers.









On 13 Mar 2018, at 04:52, Will Khan 
<khan.wa...@florey.edu.au<mailto:khan.wa...@florey.edu.au>> wrote:



Dear HCP Users,



I am currently using the ICA-FIX denoised volumetric data for 100 unrelated 
subjects. I come across an issue where melodic appears to 'choke' or remain 
idle for a considerable amount of time at the variance normalisation step. I am 
running a group-ICA within a mask of the PCC.



I understand this issue has been reported by others and appears to be a bug 
with the melodic command.



I know Steve Smith and others have cautioned against the use of the volumetric 
data - but I am using the HCP dataset to generate group-ICA maps that I later 
wish to dualreg onto a patient dataset. Since all my patient data is in NIFTI 
format I am initially hesitant to use CIFTI (please correct me if I am wrong 
here).



Am I right to be using the volumetric data in this case?



Many Thanks!



Regards,

Will











_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users<http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users>



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Head of Analysis,  Oxford University FMRIB Centre

FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford  OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726  (fax 222717)
st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk<mailto:st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk>    
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve<http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve>

---------------------------------------------------------------------------



Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet<http://smithinks.net>









_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users<http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users>



________________________________

The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare 
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the 
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying 
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please 
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org>
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users<http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users>

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to