Hi - this order: ff{1}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST1_LR/rfMRI_REST1_LR_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID); ff{2}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST1_RL/rfMRI_REST1_RL_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID); ff{3}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST2_LR/rfMRI_REST2_LR_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID); ff{4}=sprintf('%s/%d/MNINonLinear/Results/rfMRI_REST2_RL/rfMRI_REST2_RL_Atlas_MSMAll_hp2000_clean.dtseries.nii',SUBJECTS,subID);
cheers. > On 22 Aug 2018, at 22:04, Julie Tseng <julie.ts...@queensu.ca> wrote: > > Hi there, > > In the rfMRI Parcellation-Timeseries-Netmats (PTN) extensively processed > rfMRI dataset, the node timeseries are provided with all four resting state > runs concatenated for each participant. What was the order in which the 3T > resting state runs were concatenated for this result? > > Thanks for your help! > Julie > > -- > Julie Tseng > M.Sc Neuroscience (Candidate 2019) > B.ASc Mathematics & Engineering, Class of 2017 > POPMEM Computational Memory Lab > Centre for Neuroscience Studies > Queen’s University > _______________________________________________ > HCP-Users mailing list > HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org > http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering Head of Analysis, WIN (FMRIB) Oxford FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK +44 (0) 1865 610470 st...@fmrib.ox.ac.uk http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Stop the cultural destruction of Tibet _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users