Thanks Tim! I understand that, but can't it be back projected? Mor
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:23 PM Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote: > The HCP MMP 1.0 parcellation could not have been made without using > surface-based methods, due to their increased accuracy in aligning > functional areas over existing volume-based registrations. Volume-based > group data generally cannot have the cortical precision that the HCP MMP > 1.0 implies. See our paper showing this: > > https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925602 > > Tim > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:41 AM Mor Regev <more...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to use Glasser's parcellation in volume space. Is there an >> available nifti I could use? >> >> Thanks, >> Mor >> >> >> -- >> Dr. Mor Regev >> Montreal Neurological Institute >> McGill University >> 3801 University St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3801+University+St+Montreal,+QC+Canada+H3A2B4&entry=gmail&source=g> >> Montreal, QC Canada H3A2B4 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3801+University+St+Montreal,+QC+Canada+H3A2B4&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> HCP-Users mailing list >> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org >> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users >> > _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users