Thanks Tim! I understand that, but can't it be back projected?

Mor

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:23 PM Timothy Coalson <tsc...@mst.edu> wrote:

> The HCP MMP 1.0 parcellation could not have been made without using
> surface-based methods, due to their increased accuracy in aligning
> functional areas over existing volume-based registrations.  Volume-based
> group data generally cannot have the cortical precision that the HCP MMP
> 1.0 implies.  See our paper showing this:
>
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925602
>
> Tim
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:41 AM Mor Regev <more...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to use Glasser's parcellation in volume space. Is there an
>> available nifti I could use?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mor
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Mor Regev
>> Montreal Neurological Institute
>> McGill University
>> 3801 University St
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3801+University+St+Montreal,+QC+Canada+H3A2B4&entry=gmail&source=g>
>> Montreal, QC Canada H3A2B4
>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=3801+University+St+Montreal,+QC+Canada+H3A2B4&entry=gmail&source=g>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> HCP-Users mailing list
>> HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
>> http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
>>
>

_______________________________________________
HCP-Users mailing list
HCP-Users@humanconnectome.org
http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users

Reply via email to