Those are the observations. Perhaps Greg might have some thoughts on the explanations.
Matt. From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Filip Grill <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, May 8, 2019 at 8:31 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: [HCP-Users] Gambling task: clarification of Reward vs Loss being mostly random noise Dear HCP users A while ago I submitted a question regarding the gambling task to the mailing list and it was mentioned that the contrast reward>loss did not work very well (link to comment: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06435.html). In another thread regarding the gambling task Matt states that he would not trust the results of the Reward vs Loss contrast, as they are mostly random noise with some structured artefact (link to comment https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06855.html). I am wondering if we could get some more clarification of why this contrast did not work very well and why this contrast would contain random noise with some structured artefacts? /Filip Grill _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users ________________________________ The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail. _______________________________________________ HCP-Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.humanconnectome.org/mailman/listinfo/hcp-users
