Ray,

The ph5diff tests compare the output from the execution with expected output.
The test you shown here is a verification of the tool detecting conflicting use 
of
parameters (can't use both -d and -p in the same run). The program will exit 
non-zero (1)
to signify failure detected.
Any chance that the mpiexec of the HP Z800 will output extra diagnosis messages
if it returns with non-zero exit code?  If so, then the "errors" is not a real 
failure but
just a mismatch of expected output.   We have no access to an HP system.  If we 
had
access to an HP system, we could have taught the ph5diff tests to handle the 
"extra"
diagnosis messages.

Hope this helps.

-Albert
THG staff

On Feb 25, 2014, at 5:09 AM, Raymond D Wright <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I'm trying install hdf5 on a HP Z800  (2x 6-core) with Scientific Linux
> and Intel ifort, and I get 16 errors in the tests of "ph5diff". Can
> anybody help?
> 
> The first error message is:
> 
> Testing ph5diff -v -d 5 -p 0.05 --use-system-epsilon h5diff_basic1.h5
> *FAILED*
> ====Expected result (expect_sorted) differs from actual result
> (actual_sorted)
>    *** expect_sorted  2014-02-25 10:01:56.738317654 +0000
>    --- actual_sorted  2014-02-25 10:01:56.737317608 +0000
>    ***************
>    *** 1,3 ****
>    --- 1,10 ----
>    + 
>    +
> ===================================================================================
>    +
> ===================================================================================
>    + =   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
>    + =   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
>    + =   EXIT CODE: 1
>      h5diff error: -d, -p and --use-system-epsilon options are
> mutually-exclusive;
>      Try '-h' or '--help' option for more information or see the h5diff
> entry in the 'HDF5 Reference Manual'.
>      use no more than one.
> .
> .
> .
> .
> and there are 13 more of these, identical, except for the recorded time
> of output. The message seems to be saying that the test was called
> incorrectly. Could that have produced a bad result? Why didn't it fail
> on bad syntax?
> 
> 
> Any help would be much appreciated.
> 
> Ray
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
> [email protected]
> http://mail.lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org


_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org

Reply via email to