On Jun 11, 2014, at 8:11 AM, Wolfgang Leimer <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Quincey,
> 
> now I create the objects with both flags, but our tests show that 
> H5Aopen_by_idx() is still 2x slower than H5Aopen_by_name().

        Well, at least that's a 15x improvement. :-)  Still, I wouldn't think 
that it should be 2x slower, since it's the same basic code.  Can you write a 
short standalone C program that demonstrates the timing difference?

        Quincey

> lg
> Wolfgang
> 
> On 2014-05-30 00:01, Quincey Koziol wrote:
>> Hi Werner,
>> On May 21, 2014, at 6:23 AM, Werner Benger <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> What is the quickest way to open attributes in a callback from
>>> H5Aiterate2() ?
>>> It would seem that in the callback function there is the option to
>>> either call
>>> H5Aopen_by_idx() or H5Aopen_by_name() .
>>> Since the callback function receives an _H5A_info_t_ a [1]s
>>> parameter, one might
>>> expect that using its corder member to open the attribute by index
>>> would be
>>> faster than going via another name lookup. However, our experiments
>>> it is
>>> 30x slower to go via the index than via the name.
>>> Is this expected behavior? Are the alternatives?
>> Hmm, did you create the object with the "index the creation order
>> info" flag as well as the "track the creation order info" flag?
>> Quincey
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://www.hdfgroup.org/HDF5/doc/RM/RM_H5A.html#Annot-OpenByIdx
> 
> -- 
> AirborneHydroMapping Gmbh
> 
> Technikerstr. 21a
> 
> A - 6020 Innsbruck
> 
> Wolfgang Leimer
> 
> ' +43 (0)512 / 507 37 800
> 
> 7 +43 (0)512 / 507 37 899
> 
> ) +49 (0)171 / 27 16 487
> 
> * [email protected]
> 
> www.ahm.co.at
> 
> DISCLAIMER
> 
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
> delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be
> guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted,
> corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions
> in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail
> transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy
> version.
> 
> AirborneHydroMapping Gmbh, Technikerstr. 21a, A - 6020 Innsbruck, Court:
> Landesgericht Innsbruck, Registernumber:FN 398330f, VAT : ATU66100667
> 
> Please consider the environment before printing!



_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://mail.lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

Reply via email to