to be honest, I am still surprised that hdf5 doesn't contain these
state-of-the-art encoders, but rather ships bzip2 et al. which are
painfully slow and don't make any account of computer architectures (lz4
is cache aware AFAIK). But hey, coming up with a hdf5 compressor is
straight forward after one wrangled with the docs. I just don't know how
contributing to hdf5 works.

FWIW, I think the whole point of the plugin design in HDF5 is to *enable* the 
community to develop
and support what can potentially be a large variety of complex filters.

I don't think any one team, focused on the core library support could possibly 
have the resources to
also support a wide variety of compression filters.

The key thing The HDF5 Group *is* doing is managing the filter ids and managing 
information about
the filters, here...

https://support.hdfgroup.org/services/filters.html#zfp

Mark


_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

Reply via email to