For ease of development I currently use the in-tree filters in my tests so I 
haven't had to deal with the issue of H5MM_ vs raw memory routines inside the 
filters, though I don't suspect this should make a difference anyway.


I had suspected that the underlying code might be approaching the write in a 
different way and certainly this will need to be addressed. I am surprised 
however that this kind of behavior hasn't been seen before, as it is legacy 
code and should have still been hit in the library before my merge of the new 
code during parallel HDF5 operations which did not use filters; this is worth 
looking into.


I should be able to look into building HDF5 against PETSc with MVAPICH2, but if 
there are any "gotchas" I should be aware of beforehand, please let me know. 
Also, if you happen to run into any revelations on the behavior you're seeing, 
I'd also be happy to discuss them and see what arises in the way of a workable 
solution.

_______________________________________________
Hdf-forum is for HDF software users discussion.
[email protected]
http://lists.hdfgroup.org/mailman/listinfo/hdf-forum_lists.hdfgroup.org
Twitter: https://twitter.com/hdf5

Reply via email to