I was evaluating the release bits when I noticed that the change done in
HDFS-4763 to add support for starting the HDFS NFSv3 gateway, which is
marked with a "fix version" of 2.1.0-beta and included in the release notes
of RC2, is not in fact included in the RC2 release bits. It looks to me
like the change is included in branch-2.1-beta, but not branch-2.1.0-beta.

Particularly since the release notes in RC2 are incorrect in claiming that
this change is in this release, it seems like a pretty serious
issue. Ordinarily I'd say that this issue should result in a new RC, and I
would vote -1 on RC2. But, given the previous discussion that folks are
interested in releasing 2.1.0-beta with several fairly substantial bugs
that we already know about, I'll withhold my vote. If RC2 ends up getting
released as-is, we should be sure to change the fix version field on that
JIRA to be correct.

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera


On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I've created a release candidate (rc2) for hadoop-2.1.0-beta that I would
> like to get released - this fixes the bugs we saw since the last go-around
> (rc1).
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.1.0-beta-rc2/
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.1.0-beta-rc2
>
> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>
> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to