I'm -0 on rc1.

Note the latest discussion on HDFS-6527 which first resulted in that patch
being reverted from branch-2.4.1 because it was believed it wasn't
necessary, and then some more discussion which indicates that in fact the
patch for HDFS-6527 should be included in 2.4.1, but with a slightly
different test case.

I believe that rc1 was actually created after the first backport of
HDFS-6527, but before the revert, so rc1 should be functionally correct,
but the test case is not quite correct in rc1, and I believe that rc1 does
not currently reflect the actual tip of branch-2.4.1. I'm not going to
consider this a deal-breaker, but seems like we should probably clean it up.

To get this all sorted out properly, if we wanted to, I believe we should
do another backport of HDFS-6527 to branch-2.4.1 including only the amended
test case, and create a new RC from that point.

Best,
Aaron

--
Aaron T. Myers
Software Engineer, Cloudera


On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Arun C Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> I've created another release candidate (rc1) for hadoop-2.4.1 based on the
> feedback that I would like to push out.
>
> The RC is available at:
> http://people.apache.org/~acmurthy/hadoop-2.4.1-rc1
> The RC tag in svn is here:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/tags/release-2.4.1-rc1
>
> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org.
>
> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 7 days.
>
> thanks,
> Arun
>
>
>
> --
> Arun C. Murthy
> Hortonworks Inc.
> http://hortonworks.com/hdp/
>
>
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>

Reply via email to