On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 9:32 PM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com> wrote: > The problem here is that there is a 'license' directory and a file called > 'LICENSE'. If this gets extracted by jar via jar xf, it will fail. unzip > can be made to extract it via an option like -o. To make matters worse, none > of these license files match the one in the generated tarball. :(
Ah, got it. I didn't strip the trailing slash on directories. With that, it looks like the "license" directory and "LICENSE" file are the only conflict? I've not followed the development of packaging LICENSE/NOTICE in the jar files. AFAIK, it's sufficient that we have the top-level LICENSE/NOTICE in the tarball. Unless there's a LEGAL thread to the contrary, it's OK as-is. Again, I don't think we need to restart the clock on the RC vote if the release notes and LICENSE/NOTICE were fixed, but it's Andrew's time and I don't think any of these are blockers for the release. -C --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
