+1 (non-binding).

Thanks,
Hanisha




On 3/22/18, 4:06 PM, "Elek, Marton" <e...@apache.org> wrote:

>
> > We need to do this since the source tarball is our official Apache 
>release
> > artifact, the rest are convenience binaries. So the Maven profile is
> > insufficient for this.
>
>It's a very good point, but actually it could be handled with maven 
>profile and assembly descriptors. I created HDFS-13335 with a patch to 
>address this issue.
>
>I am +1 for the vote (non-binding).
>
>I am very happy with this in-tree approach as I believe that it will 
>help to establish a practice which could be used for other possible 
>features in the future. And this practice could help to get a safer 
>adoption path for upcomming new features as well.
>
>Marton
>
>On 03/22/2018 05:30 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
>> Hi Anu,
>> 
>> Again apologies in advance for phone typing, flight delays means I'm still
>> writing this from an airport :(
>> 
>> In Owen's proposal, it says to delete the module from the release branch.
>> We need to do this since the source tarball is our official Apache release
>> artifact, the rest are convenience binaries. So the Maven profile is
>> insufficient for this.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Andrew
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 21, 2018 2:33 PM, "Anu Engineer" <aengin...@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Andrew,
>> Thanks for your comment.
>> 
>>> ” Having to delete it each time means more work for mainline RMs and more
>> room for error.”
>> 
>> The current change that we have done has a maven profile called “–Phdsl,"
>> without this flag it
>> will not be compiled and will not be included in source or binary packages.
>> Therefore, explicit delete is not needed.
>> 
>> In other words, RM does not need to do any extra work. There is no change
>> to the default Hadoop Release process.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Anu
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 3/21/18, 2:18 PM, "Andrew Wang" <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> 
>>      Hi folks,
>> 
>>      Sorry for not replying earlier, I've been on vacation for the last week
>> and
>>      am writing this on my phone from the airport now. Please excuse me if
>> this
>>      is terser than my normal emails.
>> 
>>      I really like the direction of Owen's proposal, thanks Owen for driving
>>      this toward a conclusion acceptable to everyone involved.
>> 
>>      My main question about this proposal: could we release from the branch
>>      rather than merging and deleting it for every release? Since we don't
>> have
>>      a Hadoop 4 branch and branch minors off of trunk, every branch is sort
>> of a
>>      release branch. Having to delete it each time means more work for
>> mainline
>>      RMs and more room for error. Since compilation is off by default and it
>>      uses a separate precommit (which I read as ways of isolating HDSL from
>> the
>>      rest of Hadoop development), releasing from the branch feels like
>> another
>>      form of isolation along those same lines. This is also less additional
>>      infra work since we have the branch and branch precommit humming along.
>> 
>>      I think establishing the HDSL subproject achieves the desired goal of
>>      encouraging HDSL development and keeping it close to the HDFS community.
>>      Releasing from a branch does not affect the legitimacy of HDSL as a
>>      subproject and maximizes development and release speed for both mainline
>>      3.x releases and HDSL releases.
>> 
>>      Sorry again for not chiming in earlier before this VOTE was started. If
>>      this change is acceptable to everyone, hopefully we can make it without
>>      starting a new vote. I'd be happy to vote +1.
>> 
>>      Best,
>>      Andrew
>> 
>>      On Mar 21, 2018 1:17 PM, "Ajay Kumar" <ajay.ku...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>      > +1 (non-binding)
>>      >
>>      > On 3/20/18, 9:43 PM, "Jitendra Pandey" <jiten...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >     +1 (binding)
>>      >
>>      >     On 3/20/18, 8:39 PM, "Weiwei Yang" <cheersy...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>      >
>>      >         +1 (non-binding)
>>      >         I really like this proposal and thanks for all the
>> discussions.
>>      >
>>      >         --
>>      >         Weiwei
>>      >
>>      >         On 21 Mar 2018, 8:39 AM +0800, Arpit Agarwal <
>>      > aagar...@hortonworks.com>, wrote:
>>      >         +1 (binding)
>>      >
>>      >         Arpit
>>      >
>>      >         On 3/20/18, 11:21 AM, "Owen O'Malley" <owen.omal...@gmail.com>
>>      > wrote:
>>      >
>>      >         All,
>>      >
>>      >         Following our discussions on the previous thread (Merging
>> branch
>>      > HDFS-7240
>>      >         to trunk), I'd like to propose the following:
>>      >
>>      >         * HDSL become a subproject of Hadoop.
>>      >         * HDSL will release separately from Hadoop. Hadoop releases
>> will
>>      > not
>>      >         contain HDSL and vice versa.
>>      >         * HDSL will get its own jira instance so that the release
>> tags stay
>>      >         separate.
>>      >         * On trunk (as opposed to release branches) HDSL will be a
>>      > separate module
>>      >         in Hadoop's source tree. This will enable the HDSL to work on
>>      > their trunk
>>      >         and the Hadoop trunk without making releases for every change.
>>      >         * Hadoop's trunk will only build HDSL if a non-default
>> profile is
>>      > enabled.
>>      >         * When Hadoop creates a release branch, the RM will delete the
>>      > HDSL module
>>      >         from the branch.
>>      >         * HDSL will have their own Yetus checks and won't cause
>> failures
>>      > in the
>>      >         Hadoop patch check.
>>      >
>>      >         I think this accomplishes most of the goals of encouraging
>> HDSL
>>      > development
>>      >         while minimizing the potential for disruption of HDFS
>> development.
>>      >
>>      >         The vote will run the standard 7 days and requires a lazy 2/3
>>      > vote. PMC
>>      >         votes are binding, but everyone is encouraged to vote.
>>      >
>>      >         +1 (binding)
>>      >
>>      >         .. Owen
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >         �����������������������������������������������������������
>>      > ����������ХF�V�7V'67&�&R�R���â�Fg2�FWb�V�7V'67&�&T�F���6�R�
>>      > �&pФf�"FF�F����6����G2�R���â�Fg2�FWbֆV��F���6�R��&pР
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >     ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------
>>      >     To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>>      >     For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>>      >
>> 
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to