+1

if you look closely the hadoop-azure module went to 100 lines a while back
and all is good

On Wed, 19 May 2021 at 22:13, Sean Busbey <sbus...@apple.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hello!
>
> What do folks think about changing our line length guidelines to allow for
> 100 character width?
>
> Currently, we tell folks to follow the sun style guide with some exception
> unrelated to line length. That guide says width of 80 is the standard and
> our current check style rules act as enforcement.
>
> Looking at the current trunk codebase our nightly build shows a total of
> ~15k line length violations; it’s about 18% of identified checkstyle issues.
>
> The vast majority of those line length violations are <= 100 characters
> long. 100 characters happens to be the length for the Google Java Style
> Guide, another commonly adopted style guide for java projects, so I suspect
> these longer lines leaking past the checkstyle precommit warning might be a
> reflection of committers working across multiple java codebases.
>
> I don’t feel strongly about lines being longer, but I would like to move
> towards more consistent style enforcement as a project. Updating our
> project guidance to allow for 100 character lines would reduce the
> likelihood that folks bringing in new contributions need a precommit test
> cycle to get the formatting correct.
>
> Does anyone feel strongly about keeping the line length limit at 80
> characters?
>
> Does anyone feel strongly about contributions coming in that clear up line
> length violations?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to