There is some diff b/w the git tag & the src tar, the Dockerfile & the
create-release are different, Why?

Files hadoop-thirdparty/dev-support/bin/create-release and
hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-src/dev-support/bin/create-release differ

Files hadoop-thirdparty/dev-support/docker/Dockerfile and
hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-src/dev-support/docker/Dockerfile differ


ayushsaxena@ayushsaxena hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC0 % diff
hadoop-thirdparty/dev-support/bin/create-release
hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-src/dev-support/bin/create-release

444,446c444,446

<     echo "RUN groupadd --non-unique -g ${group_id} ${user_name}"

<     echo "RUN useradd -g ${group_id} -u ${user_id} -m ${user_name}"

<     echo "RUN chown -R ${user_name} /home/${user_name}"

---

>     echo "RUN groupadd --non-unique -g ${group_id} ${user_name}; exit 0;"

>     echo "RUN useradd -g ${group_id} -u ${user_id} -m ${user_name}; exit
0;"

>     echo "RUN chown -R ${user_name} /home/${user_name}; exit 0;"

ayushsaxena@ayushsaxena hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC0 % diff
hadoop-thirdparty/dev-support/docker/Dockerfile
hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-src/dev-support/docker/Dockerfile

103a104,105

> RUN rm -f /etc/maven/settings.xml && ln -s /home/root/.m2/settings.xml
/etc/maven/settings.xml

>

126a129,130

> RUN pip2 install setuptools-scm==5.0.2

> RUN pip2 install lazy-object-proxy==1.5.0

159d162

<




Other things look Ok,
* Built from source
* Verified Checksums
* Verified Signatures
* Validated files have ASF header

Not sure if having diff b/w the git tag & src tar is ok, this doesn't look
like core code change though, can anybody check & confirm?

-Ayush


On Thu, 1 Feb 2024 at 13:39, Xiaoqiao He <hexiaoq...@apache.org> wrote:

> Gentle ping. @Ayush Saxena <ayush...@gmail.com> @Steve Loughran
> <ste...@cloudera.com> @inigo...@apache.org <inigo...@apache.org> @Masatake
> Iwasaki <iwasak...@apache.org> and some other folks.
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 10:17 AM slfan1989 <slfan1...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the review and vote! Looking forward to other forks helping
> > with voting and verification.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Shilun Fan.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 6:20 PM Xiaoqiao He <hexiaoq...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Shilun for driving it and making it happen.
> > >
> > > +1(binding).
> > >
> > > [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > > [x] LICENSE files exist.
> > > [x] NOTICE is included.
> > > [x] Rat check is ok. `mvn clean apache-rat:check`
> > > [x] Built from source works well: `mvn clean install`
> > > [x] Built Hadoop trunk with updated thirdparty successfully (include
> > update
> > > protobuf shaded path).
> > >
> > > BTW, hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0 will be included in release-3.4.0, hope we
> > > could finish this vote before 2024/02/06(UTC) if there are no concerns.
> > > Thanks all.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > - He Xiaoqiao
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 10:42 PM slfan1989 <slfan1...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > Xiaoqiao He and I have put together a release candidate (RC0) for
> > Hadoop
> > > > Thirdparty 1.2.0.
> > > >
> > > > The RC is available at:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-thirdparty-1.2.0-RC0
> > > >
> > > > The RC tag is
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/releases/tag/release-1.2.0-RC0
> > > >
> > > > The maven artifacts are staged at
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1398
> > > >
> > > > Comparing to 1.1.1, there are three additional fixes:
> > > >
> > > > HADOOP-18197. Upgrade Protobuf-Java to 3.21.12
> > > > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/26
> > > >
> > > > HADOOP-18921. Upgrade to avro 1.11.3
> > > > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/24
> > > >
> > > > HADOOP-18843. Guava version 32.0.1 bump to fix CVE-2023-2976
> > > > https://github.com/apache/hadoop-thirdparty/pull/23
> > > >
> > > > You can find my public key at :
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Shilun Fan.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to