[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727865#action_12727865
]
Tsz Wo (Nicholas), SZE commented on HDFS-385:
---------------------------------------------
> Why is excludedNodes a HashMap? A HashSet should perform at least as well and
> use less memory.
It is unbelievable that java.util.HashSet is indeed a HashMap. I learned this
some time ago. The following is copied from the [HashSet
API|http://java.sun.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/HashSet.html]: "This class
implements the Set interface, backed by a hash table (actually a HashMap
instance)..."
> Design a pluggable interface to place replicas of blocks in HDFS
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-385
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-385
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: dhruba borthakur
> Assignee: dhruba borthakur
> Fix For: 0.21.0
>
> Attachments: BlockPlacementPluggable.txt,
> BlockPlacementPluggable2.txt, BlockPlacementPluggable3.txt,
> BlockPlacementPluggable4.txt, BlockPlacementPluggable4.txt
>
>
> The current HDFS code typically places one replica on local rack, the second
> replica on remote random rack and the third replica on a random node of that
> remote rack. This algorithm is baked in the NameNode's code. It would be nice
> to make the block placement algorithm a pluggable interface. This will allow
> experimentation of different placement algorithms based on workloads,
> availability guarantees and failure models.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
