[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12868897#action_12868897
]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-1143:
---------------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12444567/HDFS-1143.txt
against trunk revision 944566.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
-1 contrib tests. The patch failed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/367/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/367/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/367/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hdfs-Patch-h5.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/367/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Implement Background deletion
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1143
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1143
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: name-node
> Affects Versions: 0.22.0
> Reporter: Dmytro Molkov
> Assignee: Scott Chen
> Fix For: 0.22.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-1143.txt
>
>
> Right now if you try to delete massive number of files from the namenode it
> will freeze (sometimes for minutes). Most of the time is spent going through
> the blocks map and invalidating all the blocks.
> This can probably be improved by having a background GC process. The deletion
> will basically just remove the inode being deleted and then give the subtree
> that was just deleted to the background thread running cleanup.
> This way the namenode becomes available for the clients soon after deletion,
> and all the heavy operations are done in the background.
> Thoughts?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
