[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14247695#comment-14247695
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6425:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12687355/HDFS-6425-3.patch
  against trunk revision a095622.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 3 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9044//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9044//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Large postponedMisreplicatedBlocks has impact on blockReport latency
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6425
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6425
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Ming Ma
>         Attachments: HDFS-6425-2.patch, HDFS-6425-3.patch, 
> HDFS-6425-Test-Case.pdf, HDFS-6425.patch
>
>
> Sometimes we have large number of over replicates when NN fails over. When 
> the new active NN took over, over replicated blocks will be put to 
> postponedMisreplicatedBlocks until all DNs for that block aren't stale 
> anymore.
> We have a case where NNs flip flop. Before postponedMisreplicatedBlocks 
> became empty, NN fail over again and again. So postponedMisreplicatedBlocks 
> just kept increasing until the cluster is stable. 
> In addition, large postponedMisreplicatedBlocks could make 
> rescanPostponedMisreplicatedBlocks slow. rescanPostponedMisreplicatedBlocks 
> takes write lock. So it could slow down the block report processing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to