[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7443?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Colin Patrick McCabe updated HDFS-7443:
---------------------------------------
    Summary: Datanode upgrade to BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT fails if duplicate block 
files are present in the same volume  (was: Datanode upgrade to 
BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT sometimes fails)

> Datanode upgrade to BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT fails if duplicate block files are 
> present in the same volume
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7443
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7443
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> When we did an upgrade from 2.5 to 2.6 in a medium size cluster, about 4% of 
> datanodes were not coming up.  They treid data file layout upgrade for 
> BLOCKID_BASED_LAYOUT introduced in HDFS-6482, but failed.
> All failures were caused by {{NativeIO.link()}} throwing IOException saying 
> {{EEXIST}}.  The data nodes didn't die right away, but the upgrade was soon 
> retried when the block pool initialization was retried whenever 
> {{BPServiceActor}} was registering with the namenode.  After many retries, 
> datenodes terminated.  This would leave {{previous.tmp}} and {{current}} with 
> no {{VERSION}} file in the block pool slice storage directory.  
> Although {{previous.tmp}} contained the old {{VERSION}} file, the content was 
> in the new layout and the subdirs were all newly created ones.  This 
> shouldn't have happened because the upgrade-recovery logic in {{Storage}} 
> removes {{current}} and renames {{previous.tmp}} to {{current}} before 
> retrying.  All successfully upgraded volumes had old state preserved in their 
> {{previous}} directory.
> In summary there were two observed issues.
> - Upgrade failure with {{link()}} failing with {{EEXIST}}
> - {{previous.tmp}} contained not the content of original {{current}}, but 
> half-upgraded one.
> We did not see this in smaller scale test clusters.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to