[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Steve Loughran resolved HDFS-135. --------------------------------- Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > TestEditLog assumes that FSNamesystem.getFSNamesystem().dir is non-null, even > after the FSNameSystem is closed > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-135 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-135 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Steve Loughran > Assignee: Steve Loughran > > In my modified services, I'm setting {{FSNameSystem.dir}} to {{null}} on > {{close()}}: > {code} > if(dir != null) { > dir.close(); > dir = null; > } > {code} > This breaks TestEditLog > {code} > java.lang.NullPointerException > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSEditLog.loadFSEdits(FSEditLog.java:620) > at > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.TestEditLog.testEditLog(TestEditLog.java:148) > {code} > There are two possible conclusions here. > # Setting dir=null in {{FSNameSystem.close()}} is a regression and should be > fixed > # The test contains some assumptions that are not valid > I will leave it to others to decide; I will try and fix the code whichever > approach is chosen. Personally, I'd go for setting dir=null as it is cleaner, > but there is clearly some risk of backward's compatibility problems, at least > in test code -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)