[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14294669#comment-14294669
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6651:
---------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12694886/HDFS-6651.001.patch
  against trunk revision 18741ad.

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 5 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  There were no new javadoc warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 2.0.3) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9353//testReport/
Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9353//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Deletion failure can leak inodes permanently.
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6651
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HDFS-6651.000.patch, HDFS-6651.001.patch
>
>
> As discussed in HDFS-6618, if a deletion of tree fails in the middle, any 
> collected inodes and blocks will not be removed from {{INodeMap}} and 
> {{BlocksMap}}. 
> Since fsimage is saved by iterating over {{INodeMap}}, the leak will persist 
> across name node restart. Although blanked out inodes will not have reference 
> to blocks, blocks will still refer to the inode as {{BlockCollection}}. As 
> long as it is not null, blocks will live on. The leaked blocks from blanked 
> out inodes will go away after restart.
> Options (when delete fails in the middle)
> - Complete the partial delete: edit log the partial delete and remove inodes 
> and blocks. 
> - Somehow undo the partial delete.
> - Check quota for snapshot diff beforehand for the whole subtree.
> - Ignore quota check during delete even if snapshot is present.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to