[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14302299#comment-14302299
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-7725:
---------------------------------

bq. However, HDFS-7374 introduces another inconsistency when recomm is involved.
The second sequence in the JIRA description looks correct?

By reading the HDFS-7374 patch I see the potential issue is that 
{{HeartbeatManager}} is bypassed when decommissioning a dead node:
{code}
+    if (!node.isDecommissionInProgress()) {
+      if (!node.isAlive) {
+        LOG.info("Dead node " + node + " is decommissioned immediately.");
+        node.setDecommissioned();
+      } else if (!node.isDecommissioned()) {
+        for (DatanodeStorageInfo storage : node.getStorageInfos()) {
+          LOG.info("Start Decommissioning " + node + " " + storage
+              + " with " + storage.numBlocks() + " blocks");
+        }
+        heartbeatManager.startDecommission(node);
{code}

It seems {{DatanodeManager}} should still route the call to 
{{HeartbeatManager}}, and {{HeartbeatManager#startDecommission}} should handle 
the dead node logic. 

Maybe we should wait for HDFS-7411 to be committed and revisit the change? 

> Incorrect "nodes in service" metrics caused all writes to fail
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7725
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7725
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Ming Ma
>         Attachments: HDFS-7725.patch
>
>
> One of our clusters sometimes couldn't allocate blocks from any DNs. 
> BlockPlacementPolicyDefault complains with the following messages for all DNs.
> {noformat}
> the node is too busy (load:x > y)
> {noformat}
> It turns out the {{HeartbeatManager}}'s {{nodesInService}} was computed 
> incorrectly when admins decomm or recomm dead nodes. Here are two scenarios.
> * Decomm dead nodes. It turns out HDFS-7374 has fixed it; not sure if it is 
> intentional. cc / [~zhz], [~andrew.wang], [~atm] Here is the sequence of 
> event without HDFS-7374.
> ** Cluster has one live node. nodesInService == 1
> ** The node becomes dead. nodesInService == 0
> ** Decomm the node. nodesInService == -1
> * However, HDFS-7374 introduces another inconsistency when recomm is involved.
> ** Cluster has one live node. nodesInService == 1
> ** The node becomes dead. nodesInService == 0
> ** Decomm the node. nodesInService == 0
> ** Recomm the node. nodesInService == 1



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to