[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7714?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14314317#comment-14314317
 ] 

Hudson commented on HDFS-7714:
------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk #2051 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Mapreduce-trunk/2051/])
HDFS-7714. Simultaneous restart of HA NameNodes and DataNode can cause DataNode 
to register successfully with only one NameNode.(Contributed by Vinayakumar B) 
(vinayakumarb: rev 3d15728ff5301296801e541d9b23bd1687c4adad)
* hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt
* 
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/BPServiceActor.java


> Simultaneous restart of HA NameNodes and DataNode can cause DataNode to 
> register successfully with only one NameNode.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7714
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7714
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0
>            Reporter: Chris Nauroth
>            Assignee: Vinayakumar B
>             Fix For: 2.7.0
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-7714-001.patch, HDFS-7714-002.patch
>
>
> In an HA deployment, DataNodes must register with both NameNodes and send 
> periodic heartbeats and block reports to both.  However, if NameNodes and 
> DataNodes are restarted simultaneously, then this can trigger a race 
> condition in registration.  The end result is that the {{BPServiceActor}} for 
> one NameNode terminates, but the {{BPServiceActor}} for the other NameNode 
> remains alive.  The DataNode process is then in a "half-alive" state where it 
> only heartbeats and sends block reports to one of the NameNodes.  This could 
> cause a loss of storage capacity after an HA failover.  The DataNode process 
> would have to be restarted to resolve this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to