[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12891828#action_12891828
]
Doug Cutting commented on HDFS-202:
-----------------------------------
> My question is whether this new API should handle recursive traversal and
> symbolic resolution.
My intuition is that recursive file listings for open should follow symbolic
links, since open follows symbolic links. Recursive traversal for remove
should not follow symbolic links, but should just remove the symbolic link,
like remove does on a symbolic link.
> Add a bulk FIleSystem.getFileBlockLocations
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-202
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Arun C Murthy
> Assignee: Hairong Kuang
> Fix For: 0.22.0
>
> Attachments: hdfsListFiles.patch
>
>
> Currently map-reduce applications (specifically file-based input-formats) use
> FileSystem.getFileBlockLocations to compute splits. However they are forced
> to call it once per file.
> The downsides are multiple:
> # Even with a few thousand files to process the number of RPCs quickly
> starts getting noticeable
> # The current implementation of getFileBlockLocations is too slow since
> each call results in 'search' in the namesystem. Assuming a few thousand
> input files it results in that many RPCs and 'searches'.
> It would be nice to have a FileSystem.getFileBlockLocations which can take in
> a directory, and return the block-locations for all files in that directory.
> We could eliminate both the per-file RPC and also the 'search' by a 'scan'.
> When I tested this for terasort, a moderate job with 8000 input files the
> runtime halved from the current 8s to 4s. Clearly this is much more important
> for latency-sensitive applications...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
