[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14340444#comment-14340444
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6658:
---------------------------------

{color:red}-1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12667652/HDFS-6658.patch
  against trunk revision 01a1621.

    {color:red}-1 patch{color}.  The patch command could not apply the patch.

Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/9684//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Namenode memory optimization - Block replicas list 
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6658
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6658
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>            Reporter: Amir Langer
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>         Attachments: BlockListOptimizationComparison.xlsx, HDFS-6658.patch, 
> Namenode Memory Optimizations - Block replicas list.docx
>
>
> Part of the memory consumed by every BlockInfo object in the Namenode is a 
> linked list of block references for every DatanodeStorageInfo (called 
> "triplets"). 
> We propose to change the way we store the list in memory. 
> Using primitive integer indexes instead of object references will reduce the 
> memory needed for every block replica (when compressed oops is disabled) and 
> in our new design the list overhead will be per DatanodeStorageInfo and not 
> per block replica.
> see attached design doc. for details and evaluation results.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to