[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14364100#comment-14364100
 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-7827:
---------------------------------

Currently we still have non-protobuf image for offline processing. Thus this 
change can still be helpful especially for storage usage analysis.

Some comments on the current patch:
# After updating {{writeINodeUnderConstruction}}, we also need to update 
{{readINodeUnderConstruction}} accordingly.
# We also need a unit test to cover the under construction file with striped 
blocks.
# Instead of the following code, we can simply use 
"out.writeBoolean(cons.isWithStripedBlocks())". Whether we keep using 
"EC_STORAGE_POLICY_ID" is still under construction.
{code}
+    if (cons.isStriped()){
+      out.writeByte(HdfsConstants.EC_STORAGE_POLICY_ID);
+    }else{
+      out.writeByte(0);
+    }
{code}
# Please correct the coding format according to the project conventions.

Besides, as [~wheat9] pointed out, we also need to update WebImageViewer for 
file size calculation. Please open a separate jira to do this.

> Erasure Coding: support striped blocks in non-protobuf fsimage
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7827
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7827
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Hui Zheng
>         Attachments: HDFS-7827.000.patch, HDFS-7827.001.patch, 
> HDFS-7827.002.patch
>
>
> HDFS-7749 only adds code to persist striped blocks to protobuf-based fsimage. 
> We should also add this support to the non-protobuf fsimage since it is still 
> used for use cases like offline image processing.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to