[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7285?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14391274#comment-14391274
 ] 

Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on HDFS-7285:
-------------------------------------------

Here is the list we discussed.

h2. Phase 1 – Basic EC features
- Support (6,3)-Reed-Solomon
- Read 
-*  from closed EC files
-*  from files with some missing blocks
- Write
-*  Write to 9 datanodes in parallel
-*  Failure handling: continue writing with the remaining datanodes as long as 
#existing datanodes >= 6.
- EC blocks reconstruction 
-*  Scheduled by NN like replication
-*  Datanode executes block group reconstruction
- Block group lease recovery
-*  Datanode executes lease recovery
-*  Truncate at stripe group boundary
- NN changes
-*  EC block group placement
-*  EC zone
-*  Safemode calculation
-*  Quota
-*  Block report processing
-*  Snapshot
-*  Fsck
-*  Editlog/image
-*  Block group support
-*  EC file deletion
-*  Decommission
-*  Corrupted EC blocks
-*  ID collision
- Balancer/Mover
-*  Do not move EC blocks
- Documentation
- Testing



> Erasure Coding Support inside HDFS
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7285
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7285
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Weihua Jiang
>            Assignee: Zhe Zhang
>         Attachments: ECAnalyzer.py, ECParser.py, HDFS-7285-initial-PoC.patch, 
> HDFSErasureCodingDesign-20141028.pdf, HDFSErasureCodingDesign-20141217.pdf, 
> HDFSErasureCodingDesign-20150204.pdf, HDFSErasureCodingDesign-20150206.pdf, 
> fsimage-analysis-20150105.pdf
>
>
> Erasure Coding (EC) can greatly reduce the storage overhead without sacrifice 
> of data reliability, comparing to the existing HDFS 3-replica approach. For 
> example, if we use a 10+4 Reed Solomon coding, we can allow loss of 4 blocks, 
> with storage overhead only being 40%. This makes EC a quite attractive 
> alternative for big data storage, particularly for cold data. 
> Facebook had a related open source project called HDFS-RAID. It used to be 
> one of the contribute packages in HDFS but had been removed since Hadoop 2.0 
> for maintain reason. The drawbacks are: 1) it is on top of HDFS and depends 
> on MapReduce to do encoding and decoding tasks; 2) it can only be used for 
> cold files that are intended not to be appended anymore; 3) the pure Java EC 
> coding implementation is extremely slow in practical use. Due to these, it 
> might not be a good idea to just bring HDFS-RAID back.
> We (Intel and Cloudera) are working on a design to build EC into HDFS that 
> gets rid of any external dependencies, makes it self-contained and 
> independently maintained. This design lays the EC feature on the storage type 
> support and considers compatible with existing HDFS features like caching, 
> snapshot, encryption, high availability and etc. This design will also 
> support different EC coding schemes, implementations and policies for 
> different deployment scenarios. By utilizing advanced libraries (e.g. Intel 
> ISA-L library), an implementation can greatly improve the performance of EC 
> encoding/decoding and makes the EC solution even more attractive. We will 
> post the design document soon. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to