[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14518376#comment-14518376
 ] 

Yongjun Zhang commented on HDFS-7281:
-------------------------------------

Hi [~mingma],

I think we can get this fix to trunk targetting 3.0, and follow up with other 
improvement like [~andrew.wang] proposed in the email thread.

Would you please take a look at comment at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7281?focusedCommentId=14510451&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14510451
?

Thanks.



> Missing block is marked as corrupted block
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-7281
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7281
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ming Ma
>            Assignee: Ming Ma
>              Labels: supportability
>         Attachments: HDFS-7281-2.patch, HDFS-7281-3.patch, HDFS-7281-4.patch, 
> HDFS-7281.patch
>
>
> In the situation where the block lost all its replicas, fsck shows the block 
> is missing as well as corrupted. Perhaps it is better not to mark the block 
> corrupted in this case. The reason it is marked as corrupted is 
> numCorruptNodes == numNodes == 0 in the following code.
> {noformat}
> BlockManager
>     final boolean isCorrupt = numCorruptNodes == numNodes;
> {noformat}
> Would like to clarify if it is the intent to mark missing block as corrupted 
> or it is just a bug.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to