[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4660?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14589235#comment-14589235
 ] 

Vinayakumar B commented on HDFS-4660:
-------------------------------------

bq. After stress testing using the setup mentioned above, we have deployed the 
fix to the production cluster that generated checksum errors frequently. We 
have not seen any corruption so far. We are confident that it fixes the issue.
Thanks for the info and contribution [~kihwal].

> Block corruption can happen during pipeline recovery
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-4660
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4660
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: datanode
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.0.3-alpha
>            Reporter: Peng Zhang
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 2.7.1
>
>         Attachments: HDFS-4660.patch, HDFS-4660.patch, HDFS-4660.v2.patch
>
>
> pipeline DN1  DN2  DN3
> stop DN2
> pipeline added node DN4 located at 2nd position
> DN1  DN4  DN3
> recover RBW
> DN4 after recover rbw
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,570 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Recover 
> RBW replica 
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1004
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,570 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: 
> Recovering ReplicaBeingWritten, blk_-9076133543772600337_1004, RBW
>   getNumBytes() = 134144
>   getBytesOnDisk() = 134144
>   getVisibleLength()= 134144
> end at chunk (134144/512=262)
> DN3 after recover rbw
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,575 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Recover 
> RBW replica 
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_10042013-04-01
>  21:02:31,575 INFO 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: 
> Recovering ReplicaBeingWritten, blk_-9076133543772600337_1004, RBW
>   getNumBytes() = 134028 
>   getBytesOnDisk() = 134028
>   getVisibleLength()= 134028
> client send packet after recover pipeline
> offset=133632  len=1008
> DN4 after flush 
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,779 DEBUG 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: FlushOrsync, file 
> offset:134640; meta offset:1063
> // meta end position should be floor(134640/512)*4 + 7 == 1059, but now it is 
> 1063.
> DN3 after flush
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: PacketResponder: 
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1005, 
> type=LAST_IN_PIPELINE, downstreams=0:[]: enqueue Packet(seqno=219, 
> lastPacketInBlock=false, offsetInBlock=134640, 
> ackEnqueueNanoTime=8817026136871545)
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.fsdataset.impl.FsDatasetImpl: Changing 
> meta file offset of block 
> BP-325305253-10.2.201.14-1364820083462:blk_-9076133543772600337_1005 from 
> 1055 to 1051
> 2013-04-01 21:02:31,782 DEBUG 
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.DataNode: FlushOrsync, file 
> offset:134640; meta offset:1059
> After checking meta on DN4, I found checksum of chunk 262 is duplicated, but 
> data not.
> Later after block was finalized, DN4's scanner detected bad block, and then 
> reported it to NM. NM send a command to delete this block, and replicate this 
> block from other DN in pipeline to satisfy duplication num.
> I think this is because in BlockReceiver it skips data bytes already written, 
> but not skips checksum bytes already written. And function 
> adjustCrcFilePosition is only used for last non-completed chunk, but
> not for this situation.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to