[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14720699#comment-14720699
 ] 

Colin Patrick McCabe commented on HDFS-8965:
--------------------------------------------

bq. Do we also already have tests for invalid op lengths (e.g. greater than max 
op size)? I see testFuzzSequences but that's not explicit.

{{TestNameNodeRecovery#testNonDefaultMaxOpSize}} tests maximum op sizes.

The latest patch fixes the test failure in {{TestJournal}}.  The issue was that 
we need to ensure that {{scanOp}} works when the edit log version is newer than 
the latest version.

> Harden edit log reading code against out of memory errors
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-8965
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8965
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Colin Patrick McCabe
>            Assignee: Colin Patrick McCabe
>         Attachments: HDFS-8965.001.patch, HDFS-8965.002.patch, 
> HDFS-8965.003.patch, HDFS-8965.004.patch, HDFS-8965.005.patch
>
>
> We should harden the edit log reading code against out of memory errors.  Now 
> that each op has a length prefix and a checksum, we can validate the checksum 
> before trying to load the Op data.  This should avoid out of memory errors 
> when trying to load garbage data as Op data.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to