[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14804667#comment-14804667
 ] 

Brandon Li edited comment on HDFS-9092 at 9/17/15 10:51 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you, [~yzhangal] for the patch. Could you roughly describe the idea of 
the fix? possibly by copy&paste the comment from the code to here.


was (Author: brandonli):
Thank you, [~yzhangal] for the patch. Could you roughly describe the idea of 
the fix?

> Nfs silently drops overlapping write requests, thus data copying can't 
> complete
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9092
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9092
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: nfs
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.1
>            Reporter: Yongjun Zhang
>            Assignee: Yongjun Zhang
>         Attachments: HDFS-9092.001.patch
>
>
> When NOT using 'sync' option, the NFS writes may issue the following warning:
> org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.nfs.nfs3.OpenFileCtx: Got an overlapping write 
> (1248751616, 1249677312), nextOffset=1248752400. Silently drop it now
> and the size of data copied via NFS will stay at 1248752400.
> Found what happened is:
> 1. The write requests from client are sent asynchronously. 
> 2. The NFS gateway has handler to handle the incoming requests by creating an 
> internal write request structuire and put it into cache;
> 3. In parallel, a separate thread in NFS gateway takes requests out from the 
> cache and writes the data to HDFS.
> The current offset is how much data has been written by the write thread in 
> 3. The detection of overlapping write request happens in 2, but it only 
> checks the write request against the curent offset, and trim the request if 
> necessary. Because the write requests are sent asynchronously, if two 
> requests are beyond the current offset, and they overlap, it's not detected 
> and both are put into the cache. This cause the symptom reported in this case 
> at step 3.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to