[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14877268#comment-14877268
 ] 

Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-9111:
----------------------------------

The patch looks good to me. Thanks for the work!

{noformat}
+[WARNING] 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-client/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/protocolPB/PBHelperClient.java:179:
 warning - @See is an unknown tag -- same as a known tag except for case.
{noformat}

{noformat}
./hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/protocolPB/ClientNamenodeProtocolServerSideTranslatorPB.java:522:
              new DatanodeInfoProto[excludesList.size()])), 
{noformat}

+1 after fixing the javadoc and the whitespace warnings.

> Move hdfs-client protobuf convert methods from PBHelper to PBHelperClient
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9111
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9111
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Mingliang Liu
>            Assignee: Mingliang Liu
>         Attachments: HDFS-9111.000.patch
>
>
> *TL;DR* This jira tracks the effort of moving PB helper methods, which 
> convert client side data structure to and from protobuf, to the 
> {{hadoop-hdfs-client}} module.
> Currently the {{PBHelper}} class contains helper methods converting both 
> client and server side data structures from/to protobuf. As we move client 
> (and common) classes to {{hadoop-hdfs-client}} module (see [HDFS-8053] and 
> [HDFS-9039]), we also need to move client module related PB converters to 
> client module.
> A good place may be a new class named {{PBHelperClient}}. After this, the 
> existing {{PBHelper}} class stays in {{hadoop-hdfs}} module with converters 
> for converting server side data structures.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to