[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14935404#comment-14935404
]
Haohui Mai commented on HDFS-9170:
----------------------------------
The main benefit that (2) offers is that the implementation and the unit tests
reside together, thus it's slightly easier to maintain. It looks like the
benefit is marginal, and (1) sounds more reasonable then. I'll go with option
(1).
> Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to a separate module
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-9170
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Haohui Mai
> Assignee: Haohui Mai
>
> After HDFS-6200 the Java implementation of hdfs-client has be moved to a
> separate hadoop-hdfs-client module.
> libhdfs, fuse-dfs and libwebhdfs still reside in the hadoop-hdfs module.
> Ideally these modules should reside in the hadoop-hdfs-client. However, to
> write unit tests for these components, it is often necessary to run
> MiniDFSCluster which resides in the hadoop-hdfs module.
> This jira is to discuss how these native modules should layout after
> HDFS-6200.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
