[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14944104#comment-14944104 ]
Mingliang Liu commented on HDFS-9199: ------------------------------------- Thanks for reporting this. I agree that we need to make the replication config keys' name consistent. I see {code} public static final String DFS_REPLICATION_MAX_KEY = "dfs.replication.max"; public static final int DFS_REPLICATION_MAX_DEFAULT = 512; {code} and {code} public static final String DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_CONSIDERLOAD_KEY = "dfs.namenode.replication.considerLoad"; public static final boolean DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_CONSIDERLOAD_DEFAULT = true; public static final String DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_INTERVAL_KEY = "dfs.namenode.replication.interval"; public static final int DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_INTERVAL_DEFAULT = 3; public static final String DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_MIN_KEY = "dfs.namenode.replication.min"; public static final int DFS_NAMENODE_REPLICATION_MIN_DEFAULT = 1; {code} Do we need to consider all of them as well? Which clause of renaming is preferred? I think these keys are all used in namenode. > rename dfs.namenode.replication.min to dfs.replication.min > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-9199 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9199 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Allen Wittenauer > Assignee: Mingliang Liu > > dfs.namenode.replication.min should be dfs.replication.min to match the other > dfs.replication config knobs. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)