[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Haohui Mai updated HDFS-9170: ----------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Fix Version/s: 2.8.0 Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) I've committed the patch to trunk and branch-2. Thanks Jing for the reviews. > Move libhdfs / fuse-dfs / libwebhdfs to hdfs-client > --------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-9170 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9170 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Haohui Mai > Assignee: Haohui Mai > Fix For: 2.8.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-9170.000.patch, HDFS-9170.001.patch, > HDFS-9170.002.patch, HDFS-9170.003.patch, HDFS-9170.004.patch > > > After HDFS-6200 the Java implementation of hdfs-client has be moved to a > separate hadoop-hdfs-client module. > libhdfs, fuse-dfs and libwebhdfs still reside in the hadoop-hdfs module. > Ideally these modules should reside in the hadoop-hdfs-client. However, to > write unit tests for these components, it is often necessary to run > MiniDFSCluster which resides in the hadoop-hdfs module. > This jira is to discuss how these native modules should layout after > HDFS-6200. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)