[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14978708#comment-14978708 ]
Kihwal Lee commented on HDFS-9279: ---------------------------------- Actually, I think this makes more sense. Assuming roughly even distribution of data, excluding everything from dicomm'ing nodes makes the used/total unchanged initially. As blocks are replicated used/total will increase. I think this tracks the reality better. > Decomissioned capacity should not be considered for configured/used capacity > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-9279 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9279 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 2.6.1 > Reporter: Kuhu Shukla > Assignee: Kuhu Shukla > Attachments: HDFS-9279-v1.patch, HDFS-9279-v2.patch, > HDFS-9279-v3.patch, HDFS-9279-v4.patch > > > Capacity of a decommissioned node is being accounted as configured and used > capacity metrics. This gives incorrect perception of cluster usage. > Once a node is decommissioned, its capacity should be considered similar to a > dead node. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)