[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15014776#comment-15014776
 ] 

Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-9079:
---------------------------------

Thanks Uma.

bq. you mean 3 ?
3 is sufficient with the default EC policy. Considering other possible 
policies, like 10+4, we can be a little conservative.

Regarding the other issue: even without this change, DN could have higher GS 
than the NN copy in a certain time window. The protocol in this patch 
guarantees that the GS is in sync on all DNs and the NN when the block is ended 
-- block is full or file is closed. I think whenever the queued BR is processed 
in the original logic, same processing will happen after the change. Will check 
the code to make sure.

> Erasure coding: preallocate multiple generation stamps and serialize updates 
> from data streamers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-9079
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9079
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: erasure-coding
>    Affects Versions: HDFS-7285
>            Reporter: Zhe Zhang
>            Assignee: Zhe Zhang
>         Attachments: HDFS-9079-HDFS-7285.00.patch, HDFS-9079.01.patch, 
> HDFS-9079.02.patch, HDFS-9079.03.patch, HDFS-9079.04.patch, 
> HDFS-9079.05.patch, HDFS-9079.06.patch, HDFS-9079.07.patch, 
> HDFS-9079.08.patch, HDFS-9079.09.patch, HDFS-9079.10.patch, HDFS-9079.11.patch
>
>
> A non-striped DataStreamer goes through the following steps in error handling:
> {code}
> 1) Finds error => 2) Asks NN for new GS => 3) Gets new GS from NN => 4) 
> Applies new GS to DN (createBlockOutputStream) => 5) Ack from DN => 6) 
> Updates block on NN
> {code}
> With multiple streamer threads run in parallel, we need to correctly handle a 
> large number of possible combinations of interleaved thread events. For 
> example, {{streamer_B}} starts step 2 in between events {{streamer_A.2}} and 
> {{streamer_A.3}}.
> HDFS-9040 moves steps 1, 2, 3, 6 from streamer to {{DFSStripedOutputStream}}. 
> This JIRA proposes some further optimizations based on HDFS-9040:
> # We can preallocate GS when NN creates a new striped block group 
> ({{FSN#createNewBlock}}). For each new striped block group we can reserve 
> {{NUM_PARITY_BLOCKS}} GS's. If more than {{NUM_PARITY_BLOCKS}} errors have 
> happened we shouldn't try to further recover anyway.
> # We can use a dedicated event processor to offload the error handling logic 
> from {{DFSStripedOutputStream}}, which is not a long running daemon.
> # We can limit the lifespan of a streamer to be a single block. A streamer 
> ends either after finishing the current block or when encountering a DN 
> failure.
> With the proposed change, a {{StripedDataStreamer}}'s flow becomes:
> {code}
> 1) Finds DN error => 2) Notify coordinator (async, not waiting for response) 
> => terminates
> 1) Finds external error => 2) Applies new GS to DN (createBlockOutputStream) 
> => 3) Ack from DN => 4) Notify coordinator (async, not waiting for response)
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to